Rosetta Stone Play Rsd

L’ARGOMENTO DELLA SETTIMANA - 3 – 9 AGOSTO 2009

ANCORA SULLA RU486: E ANCORA UNA VOLTA FINI PERDE UN’OTTIMA OCCASIONE PER STARE ZITTO.

Non sarei tornato così a breve sull’argomento della RU486, il nuovo ritrovato omicida, la cui commercializzazione è stata da poco autorizzata in Italia. Ne ho già parlato, ne hanno parlato voci ben più autorevoli della mia, e soprattutto la Chiesa ha assunto un atteggiamento che non lascia, grazie al Cielo, alcun spazio ad equivoci.

But the ineffable Gianfranco Fini forced to return to this subject. Why? Why Senator Gasparri, Chairman of the PDL in the Senate, the Senate has confirmed that it will promote a survey on the pill RU486. things to be clarified in fact out there, and even those who (God forgive them!) are in favor of legalized abortion by the notorious Law 194, should have the desire to better understand some things, not least of which of the possible dangers to the life of mother, as well as the unusual haste with which it acted AIFA (Italian Agency for the drug), at the very beginning of the summer (with that the public has in mind primarily the holidays), and without any particular urgency to explain such a hurry. In fact, let us remember that the pill RU486 is not a "drug" understood in the correct direction, that is something that serves to make a patient feel better, or save his life. It is, in effect, half murderer. Used to match.

However, Gasparri wants to promote the survey and may do so because, he says, "With all due respect AIFA, the Parliament is much more important and is legitimized by the vote of citizens." Arises Gianfranco Fini: "It 's original that Parliament should pronounce on the effectiveness of a drug ... is the drug that the agency has already decided, I do not see what the Parliament has to do. "

Now, Fini is not a fool. So what he said is the result of sheer bad faith. Gaspar did not speak of "effectiveness" of the drug, but on hearing the whole story of RU486. and in this situation if there is something original, is the fact that the Speaker of the House find that there are matters on which Parliament can not intervene. The Agency of the drug is not a ruler whose empire dictated sono da accettare a capo chino, ispirati dal Cielo. Fini, che ancora pochi giorni fa si doleva del frequente ricorso alla decretazione d’urgenza e alla fiducia, che impedirebbero al Parlamento di discutere liberamente un progetto di legge, ora scopre che però ci sono materie su cui il Parlamento deve stare zittino e buono. Chi poi sia abilitato a distinguere tra le materie “discutibili” e quelle “sacre e intoccabili”, non si sa. Per ora questo arduo compito se lo è assunto il presidente della Camera, Gianfranco Fini.

Fini non è un fesso, e conosce la Costituzione. A Who owns the power in Italy? To the sovereign people, which is exercised through its representatives, who are members of parliament. Ergo, the Parliament is sovereign and decides what should or should not discuss. If tomorrow the House and Senate decided to devote entire sessions to the harvesting of shellfish or knitting, no authority could be no objection. It would certainly be a case of psychiatry, but, again, is that Parliament is sovereign, why is that people who are just sovereign.

It is hypocritical to want to defend that sovereignty when it suits them and forget it at the right moment. It is hypocritical to declare "unquestionable" the decisions of an Agency anything that is not sovereign, but simply carrying on the activities that are specified by law, nor above all has its legitimacy in the citizens' vote, while Gasparri has quite rightly made clear that Parliament is entitled to vote.

not more than two or three months ago, some MPs disaster, possibly suffering from some problems, had proposed, with total disregard of the ridiculous that the Prime Minister is in the House to talk about her divorce. It was a claim by morons, because you can not see who might be interested in this topic, if not married to Berlusconi. Why then, Gianfranco Fini, che riesce così bene a discernere le competenze di tutto e di tutti, non intervenne per dire: “Signori, cerchiamo di non fare i buffoni, il Parlamento si occupa di politica”?

Ma Fini, si sa, ha i suoi problemi. Per anni ha scalpitato per liberarsi dalla presenza ingombrante di Berlusconi, sapendo però bene che senza Berlusconi AN non sarebbe mai arrivata al Governo e sapendo bene che la creazione del PdL era necessaria per avere una destra unita ed efficace. E poiché nella sua pur prestigiosa poltrona Fini si considera messo in freezer (e un poco, effettivamente, lo è), da tempo ormai ci fornisce dichiarazioni e atteggiamenti per cui non si longer understands who he is and what you think about to represent. Certainly the "external" Fini are always in line with that vulgar conformism and conservative right of the left.

And the RU 486 was no exception. Since abortion is a matter that is sacred to the victims, here Fini immediately sided with the AIFA and discutibilissima decision comes a nonsense to say that as president of the Chamber is very serious, namely that there are issues on which the chambers can not intervene.

Testimonials alcuni che Fini si comporti così perché aspira al Quirinale e quindi vuole rendersi accettabile a una sinistra, facendo nel contempo conto sui suoi fedelissimi a destra. Ma probabilmente sbaglia i conti, perché molti dei suoi “fedelissimi” si stanno realmente rompendo le scatole, vedendo il loro ex segretario che sembra sia diventato un seguace della setta orfica “Scalfari-Repubblica-Espresso”, il cui motto è: “conformismo conformismo, conformismo”.

Comunque speriamo invece che l’indagine conoscitiva si faccia e si faccia seriamente. A prescindere dal fatto, ASSOLUTAMENTE INDISCUTIBILE, che la RU 486 is half a murderer, there are many things to clarify, not the least of which the actual risk to the mother. For the child there is nothing to clarify, because for him, poor and helpless, there is still killing. Monsignor Fisichella, President of the Pontifical Academy for Life, said that "it is not clear why such action is taken with great urgency by AIFA to approve the pill ..."

Yes, because so urgently? Even before they ask, whereas the RU 486 is not a life-saving medicine. It is the exact opposite.

Of course, it was decided while the majority of the public was distracted from the beginning of the holidays.

But then I ask myself my one little question. I ask me because they are very bad and suspicious nature. And the question is this: In all of this squalid affair, WHICH PROVIDES A MEANS MORE 'A Wretched MOTHERS ready to kill her own child, has no meaning in the profits they generated for the (OR) HOUSE / E manufacturing pharmaceuticals THE RU 486 E ALLE QUALI SI APRE UN NUOVO MERCATO PER MILIONI E MILIONI DI PILLOLE DA PRODURRE E VENDERE?

Naturalmente solo la mia perversa cattiveria può generare questi dubbi. Ciò che preme agli apostoli della libertà della donna è solo, appunto la libertà della donna. Libera di uccidere. Bella roba e Bella Ciao. I soldi, è arciovvio, non c’entrano nulla.