INSEGNAMENTO DELLA RELIGIONE CATTOLICA E TAR DEL LAZIO. IGNORANZA, FAZIOSITA’, CONFORMISMO E MILLE ALTRE PIACEVOLEZZE.
Relaxing? Let it never be! There is a category that makes you feel more alert, because he can shoot his shots in the most unexpected moments. I refer to idiots secularists and those who want to give me too partisan for the union that I do between the adjective and the noun. (For regular readers of the Republic: "idiots" is the adjective, "secularists" the noun). They are tireless
Yes, because in this story of the Judgement of the TAR of Lazio, according to la quale l’insegnamento della religione cattolica non può costituire credito formativo, e gli insegnanti della stessa non possono partecipare “a pieno titolo” agli scrutini, ci giocano, oltre a un indiscutibile rabbioso laicismo, anche una sostanziale stupidità, figlia di una madornale ignoranza. Trattasi di due streghe cattive che amano lavorare aiutandosi a vicenda.
But if the Pannella is forgivable, because it has long been cooked in the brain, not forgivable are judges who ignore the law. And the teaching of Catholic religion in schools is governed by the law of 03.25.1985 no. 121, which ratified the revision of the Concordat between the Holy See and Italy, where among other things states that "
As I said, if anyone can forgive the ignorance of the laws, especially considering that we have too many, they are not forgiven those who have to their profession to enforce the law. Magistrates, police and so on. Otherwise, we also accept that your doctor can ignore any part of the medicine, or that the engineer may have the ideas a bit 'confused on how to build a palace. And so on.
Ergo, our brave judges have satisfied their lust for fame, ma hanno anche fatto una misera figura. A che titolo infatti possano discriminare gli insegnanti di una materia il cui insegnamento nella scuola pubblica è previsto dalla legge, è un mistero. E le risposte possono essere solo due. O sono dei grandi ignoranti o sono dei grandi faziosi, che intanto fanno il possibile per usare del loro potere con fini partigiani, ben sapendo che nessuno mai li sanzionerà.
Quindi, anzitutto, i giudici del TAR del Lazio non hanno fatto il loro dovere, e se l’Italia fosse un Paese dove fosse ancora possibile avere fiducia nella giustizia, e se il CSM non fosse un ridicolo organo corporativo di protezione aprioristica, giudici di tal fatta sarebbero invitati a trovarsi un altro mestiere.
Ma ammettiamo che non were all ignorant. And then you can not say any more that are biased, and that their bias does not arise from either ideological convictions, but from the ancient Italic modus vivendi with Don Abbondio, always ready to take the part of the strongest. Currently hitting Catholicism is like shooting on the Red Cross. Are you sure that will never come a shot in self-defense. And it is very "in". Who does it affect
Let us not forget that this is the country that has seen the shame of a University which has prevented the Pope from speaking, or remember that the Pope himself was represented ( by some "artist" very fashionable) as a rather disgusting and perverted old man, in an exhibition in Milan. And this insult was left exposed for several days before the mayor himself was not aware of and made him remove. Let us not forget that our is the country where a murderous father, Beppino Englaro, went around to schools to give young people how beautiful his moral perversion. Universities that have missed or are called to be a lesson former terrorists. In this mess, there is room for everyone.
I am reminded of a quote from Giorgio Pisano, and you are free to fall away if you find it too vulgar, "In Italy every idiot who has to say two or three nonsense find an audience. "
But we also want to make an absurd hypothesis to save the miserable judges? Let's. Italy is actually on the verge of an awful abyss, the clerical dictatorship is coming, free thinkers and those who do not profess the Catholic religion were deported in secret places, where they are sentenced to hard labor. Here are some brave judges with contempt of danger, at least in schools choosing to block the advance of the tremendous steamroller clerical-fascist.
And so do the shape of suckers. Yes, because do not know the distinction between catechesis and religious instruction. In fact, the precise aim of catechesis is the formation of the believer, and this is done in parishes with the lessons of the catechism, to which the parents are perfectly free to choose whether or not to send their children.
The teaching of the Catholic religion is, instead, (it says the same word) the teaching of a religious tradition that is secondary and not a fundamental part of our culture, and which has influenced literature, art, architecture, law and many other subjects. The teaching of the Catholic religion has by no means in order to convert the student is not a believer, but to warn believers and nonbelievers, on a series of religious and cultural values \u200b\u200bthat are the same in the seventh century, made it to Europe, which was now with the relapse into barbarism end of the Roman Empire, to be reborn and to find forms of civil society, in the wake of that tremendous movement not only religious but also social and cultural, which was monasticism.
perfectly free the student to remain an atheist all my life. But without doubt it will be less prepared by the cultural point of view who does not know religion Catholic, today, most without realizing it, affects our lives even in civil relations. Who does not know understand much less extensive periods of literature, philosophy, whether in positive or negative, they found their source in the Catholic religion.
Some wonder why we see even in the most remote village stands a tower, because we are celebrating on Sunday, and at Christmas and Easter, because we live right in 2009 and not in some another year. I know I'm saying platitudes, but now here you also forget the trivial sense that we says that ours is a Christian civilization, developed through
is a Christian civilization in which no one has been ordered to be Christian. And this should prompt some reflection to our rabid secularists.
In a school where a course in Caribbean dance is like "training credits" a handful of judges in search of fame decreed that the teaching of the Catholic religion has no weight.
And so we will have more and more young people totally ignorant about
Ebbene, nel cartone animato “Dumbo”, il piccolo elefante viene portato ovviamente da una cicogna alla mamma elefantessa, che lo attende con ansia. La cicogna, in abito da postino, al momento di consegnare il fagotto che contiene il piccolo, dice “un regalo da Gesù, per amarlo sempre più”. Questo nella versione originale. A partire dai primi anni ottanta nelle videocassette di questo cartone animato la parola “Gesù” è scrupolosamente tolta, e la cicogna si limita a dire alla mamma elefantessa di firmare il bollettino per ricevuta.
Nel film “Fra Diavolo”, insieme alla vicenda principale, che vede gli spassosi pasticci combinati da Stanlio e Ollio, divenuti loro malgrado servitori del famoso bandito, c’è anche una storia d’amore. La figlia dell’oste è innamorata di un giovane ufficiale, ovviamente povero, ma il padre le impone le nozze con un giovane tanto ricco quanto antipatico e vanesio. Arriva il giorno delle indesiderate nozze and from the tavern is the place of the event approaches the procession accompanying the groom. There are young girls who dance and throw flowers, there are young men who sing and there is a monk who goes silent. Clearly it is the celebrant. Even in "Fra Diavolo" subsequent versions have seen on video cutting secularist complaint: The parade is always the same, but it was deleted the figure of a monk. We do not know who will celebrate her marriage, but never that it is a religious marriage ...
I did not give but two examples of what I said in opening: i cretini laicisti sono infaticabili.
0 comments:
Post a Comment