Captain Morgan Seven Up

CONTRO LA RU486, PILLOLA PER UCCIDERE

Con grande piacere pubblico questo articolo, trasmessomi dal Comitato Verità e Vita:

The Truth and the Life Committee invites you to read the editorial, signed by Thomas Scandroglio, published on August 8 of the Future.

It 's a wonderful article because, as he always did the Truth and the Life, because it attacks the abortion pill, rather than harmful because the woman (victim along with her baby!).

The secretariat

"A DJUSTMENT" OTHER P AESI NOT JUSTIFY 'ADOPTION OF RU 486 The pick of Europe to disrupt the life T OMMASO Scandroglio One of the tricks more used to pass certain ideas - you know os'intuiscono not shared by the majority of the country - is to take as a model to imitate the laws of other states. You often hear people repeat like a mantra that Italy is lagging behind Europe if not the world experimentation on embryos and in access to the techniques of artificial insemination, in recognizing the rights of homosexuals ... Finally he resorted to this expedient for the RU486, a drug approved by the effects of abortion a few days ago by the Italian drug. To plead the cause of abortion drug has been invoked, among others, on two arguments both suffering from acute xenophilia: now more than twenty European countries where RU486 was adopted in 2007 the European Commission gave the green light for doing just this mixture the opinion of the EMEA, the European Medicines Agency. Basically we are told that if other countries, so many and with the approval of a supranational body, decided to market RU486 in this is automatically mean that this preparation is on the side of women's health and that Italy is guilty of having arrived so late for this important meeting on the voluntary interruption della gravidanza. È proprio così? Proviamo ad analizzare queste obiezioni. Il metro di paragone per comprendere se una legge, un semplice provvedimento amministrativo o una decisione tecnica come quella dell’Aifa sono leciti sul piano morale non può essere dato dal confronto con le esperienze di altri Stati o dal fatto che esista il beneplacito di un organo internazionale. Ciò che è stato ritenuto legittimo in una nazione non lo diventa per ciò stesso in un’altra, fosse pure confinante. Pare quasi banale ricordarlo. Ogni Stato – si sente ripetere sovente – è sovrano nel suo territorio. La pietra di paragone per assegnare la patente di liceità sul piano etico e legitimacy lies in the legal side comparison with the common good. It is readily apparent that the removal of a human being, innocent perilous, affecting the common good, so much so that - wanting to make the heterophile we - the world does not exist a legal system that does not punish murder. The RU486 is a means, in addition to the surgery to remove a small human being, and no European Commission nor any law of any State can never change the nature of this fact so dramatic nihil contra facta valent argumenta. also on the appraisal by the Commission European Union, from a purely legal point of view we are not in the presence of an act that nature is absolutely mandatory for the States as it may be a regulation or, to varying degrees, in a directive. It is neither more nor less than an act of approval is not binding on any state to take the RU486. Strange then that a selection is made upstream at the entrance of foreign law which should be emulated within our borders. I wonder why you hear such a clamor to import from us the rules that allow the exploitation of nuclear energy in France, or those employed on the Chinese. Yes, that's France, a country that is always mentioned as an example because it was the first back in 1988, ad adottare la Ru486. Se vogliamo essere proprio esterofili e avere lo sguardo aperto sul mondo, facciamolo nella consapevolezza di cosa provoca la pillola abortiva in qualunque parte del pianeta venga somministrata: la morte di chi sta per nascere. E il dolore per la morte di un bambino non ha confini.